In the double-slit experiment concerning singularly
generated particles, a double-slit screen is positioned between a particle
source and a detection screen or device. The screen then displays what is seen
as an “interference pattern” revealing the location of where each particle
struck the screen after passing through the slits. For more than a century
people have been confounded as to exactly why an interference pattern would
appear when it seems impossible that any interference could exist.
Using a new theory producing method, dubbed “RM”, and a new ontology, Affectance Ontology, I
hypothesize that if the inner surface of the double-slit screen was altered to
a specific surface shape, particles would no longer create a significant
interference pattern, but waves still would. Since a photon seems as a particlized
wave, I suspect that photons would show little difference from their typical
interference pattern, as their inherent wave properties would still have
predominate effect. But if they also stopped showing the interference pattern, it
would indicate that photons really are strictly particles.
Note that the inner walls of the screen must be randomized
in height such that its greatest height is equal to or greater than the
expected largest interference pattern wavelength. All inner walls should have a
random surface. It would be good if the display screen was also shaped
similarly, but such should not be necessary.
