I find it interesting that in the modern age of nitpicking scrutiny, it seems that no one has noticed that a law of nature is actually a material entity, matter.
It is a misconception that natural laws are not material and thus argument arises concerning whether immaterial things, "like laws" exist. The truth is that laws are actually material entities and actually nothing else really exists at all.
The property of being material or not is gauged by firmness, reluctance to be changed. By mere concept alone, a true law of nature is extremely firm, if not totally immutable. But more than that, is the point that what a law is, is being entirely misrepresented.
When someone writes a statement, that statement might be said to be a law. But in reality, the statement isn’t the law, but a mere language representation of the law much like a word isn't the concept, but merely a language reference to the concept. Assuming the stated law was correct, the law itself is a part of reality, not a statement.
But can a law be touched? You might think that it can’t be, but actually the laws are the only things actually “touched”.
Although it is typically very hard to comprehend, the truth is that when you look at the very foundation of physical existence, there is no “substance” from which matter is constructed other than mere affect upon affect, affecting and being affected, nothing more. There is nothing being affected or doing the affecting other than the “force” of affect, “affectance”.
But this affecting is not random, else it could have no overall effect that wasn’t also entirely 100% random and unruly. Affectance affects by definable behaviors, “laws”. A law is a behavior. And a behavior is all there is, the behavior of affect, mutual affect to be precise. All existence of formed of mutual affect – the behavior of changing the changing – the laws of change.
It is natural law that you run into when you don't watch where you are going.
Law is the ONLY true material within all reality. Law is the "matter".
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Monday, July 19, 2010
Religion and Scientism
The problem is merely what to do with 6 billion irrational people.
You can't ask them to just be logical or rational. If they could do that, they would be doing it already. But they already think they are. Billions of irrational humans were spawned and have created a huge population void of deep thinking ability. Socialism attempts to maintain a few clever souls keeping the masses in line and in order.
The religions (including the newer Scientism) were designed, by whatever means, to retain the legion; maintain the gathering. They are society's ego. They have always assumed a socialistic oligarchical architecture. Such an architecture has the inherent and unavoidable problem of having to keep irrational people inspired with exaggerated concerns; wars, diseases, and "blood" conflicts.
True understanding of the real situation has always been the exclusive domain of the few elite, except that they never realize that by such a proprietary claim on hidden Truth, they blind themselves in false confidence. Such a situation then leaves the entire population from the least intelligent to the highest elite influence as actually truly insane, not really knowing good from bad and being held that way eternally.
Each side of every argument believes they are the wise, rational people and the other side are the stubborn foolish ones. The phrase, "you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground" came from the concept that a person doesn't know his mere stubbornness (his ass) from something missing in his understanding (a hole in his grounding). Such a phrase suits the entire population.
Extremely few people ever learn how to know that they know without merely being presumptuous. Yet so very many are willing to be ultimately stubborn in their arguments. The religions and today the governments as well, instill that property into people. It is intentional that people are blinded from their own cause of stubbornness. That is how you make a strong proponent for your cause, whatever it is. You turn people into asses so you can ride them through rough territory. Asses riding asses to market ass meat and ass blood to other asses.
Today's technology merely serves to make it easier to maintain the relentless insanity, to mechanize it even to the point of removing the need to involve humans at all. But why not physically improve what a human is since we have the technology with which to play. So now we have insane people redesigning humanity to fit their insane image of a god to forever control all things. Ever heard the expression, "the inmates have taken over the asylum"?
Yeah, reconcile Scientism with Religion; two names and political parties for the same thing. Reconcile them into what? A single political party with no competition or contrast with which to see their worst weaknesses? Well, that might be one way to stop it all. Take away Mankind's contrast consciousness entirely.
The only other option is to form a small, very small gathering of the extremely few who can understand life and logical rationale.
Good luck finding them.
You can't ask them to just be logical or rational. If they could do that, they would be doing it already. But they already think they are. Billions of irrational humans were spawned and have created a huge population void of deep thinking ability. Socialism attempts to maintain a few clever souls keeping the masses in line and in order.
The religions (including the newer Scientism) were designed, by whatever means, to retain the legion; maintain the gathering. They are society's ego. They have always assumed a socialistic oligarchical architecture. Such an architecture has the inherent and unavoidable problem of having to keep irrational people inspired with exaggerated concerns; wars, diseases, and "blood" conflicts.
True understanding of the real situation has always been the exclusive domain of the few elite, except that they never realize that by such a proprietary claim on hidden Truth, they blind themselves in false confidence. Such a situation then leaves the entire population from the least intelligent to the highest elite influence as actually truly insane, not really knowing good from bad and being held that way eternally.
Each side of every argument believes they are the wise, rational people and the other side are the stubborn foolish ones. The phrase, "you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground" came from the concept that a person doesn't know his mere stubbornness (his ass) from something missing in his understanding (a hole in his grounding). Such a phrase suits the entire population.
Extremely few people ever learn how to know that they know without merely being presumptuous. Yet so very many are willing to be ultimately stubborn in their arguments. The religions and today the governments as well, instill that property into people. It is intentional that people are blinded from their own cause of stubbornness. That is how you make a strong proponent for your cause, whatever it is. You turn people into asses so you can ride them through rough territory. Asses riding asses to market ass meat and ass blood to other asses.
Today's technology merely serves to make it easier to maintain the relentless insanity, to mechanize it even to the point of removing the need to involve humans at all. But why not physically improve what a human is since we have the technology with which to play. So now we have insane people redesigning humanity to fit their insane image of a god to forever control all things. Ever heard the expression, "the inmates have taken over the asylum"?
Yeah, reconcile Scientism with Religion; two names and political parties for the same thing. Reconcile them into what? A single political party with no competition or contrast with which to see their worst weaknesses? Well, that might be one way to stop it all. Take away Mankind's contrast consciousness entirely.
The only other option is to form a small, very small gathering of the extremely few who can understand life and logical rationale.
Good luck finding them.
Friday, July 2, 2010
The Eternal Universe – An Ocean of Motion
The universe that never began and can never end is the one you see around you.
Premises;
1) Infinite similarity is impossible (by definition of "infinite").
2) Every point in space affects every other point adjacent to it (by definition of "adjacency").
3) Infinite discontinuity is impossible.
The Unbeginning
Logically these premises mean that at all times what looks like empty space to us is really an ocean of subtle motion. A different state of existence logically cannot ever be and has never been. As it is impossible for existence to be in any other state, there could never have been a beginning to the only state possible.
The Quantum Magi talk about "random" creations, but it is not "random". Nothing is ever actually random. The subtle motion within every seemingly empty area of space is in the form of "affectance" or what we could measure as electromagnetic and/or gravitational waves if they were large enough to detect.
Emergence
Smooth waves, rather than spiking random points, are formed due to the mutual affect of every point on its adjacent points. The waves move due to every point in every wave still affecting every adjacent point as the mutual affecting causes shifting in the wave peaks. The "splashing" around of those affectance waves creates a probability pattern concerning the strength of the waves. That pattern is what we eventually see as the beginning essence of the universe emerging, seemingly from nothingness.
As the strength of some waves increase sufficiently, they combine in collision with other waves to form a small particle wherein the affectance noise is clustered around a single point. That congestion of noise containing maximum rates of change is what causes the particle to have inertia and a field of gravity surrounding it as the congestion spreads. It becomes a "hard" particle due to the amount of congested affectance noise. We then declare it to be "matter".
Eventually, the numerous particles begin clumping as they attract each other through both gravity as well as electric potential differences. Some particles merge in such a way as to form a large single particle as their noise unites into a single spinning cluster. This aggregating forms positive, negative and neutral particles that form atoms and larger mass clusters.
Very slowly, larger masses and objects are formed. Trillions of years latter, those clusters have attracted more such clusters and form larger masses such as gas clouds, and small stones.
Eventually a very large single particle is formed that has a comparatively huge inertia and gravity. That particle begins to suck in everything around it as it forms into what we see as a "black-hole". The average black-hole is estimated to have several hundred million times more energy absorbed into it than the average star/sun and they just keep growing.
Such black-holes form at extreme distances from each other. But having extreme mass attraction and necessarily having a difference in electric potential, they have no reason to stay away from each other forever and slowly begin to converge as they still grow. What do you think happens to all of that energy once one falls into another? Even if there had never been a Big Bang, eventually there would be.
The Bang
Eventually the speeding single particle black-holes collide. When some collide at perhaps not too great a speed, they absorb into each other to become merely a still larger single particle black-hole. But some collisions occur at such extreme speeds that the black hole particles explode. When that happens, they release enormous amounts of energy in the form of huge particle clumps and clusters that take the form of stars and large planets and meteors as well as a tremendous amount of radiant energy and smaller formed particles.
But still later, all of that newly formed exploding mass and energy form their own new particles as mass attraction and electric potential still keep bringing them together and forcing them to ether bond in orbits or unite into single particles. The star clusters are so energetic that the bonding cannot keep up with the releasing collision energy and thus they get into a burning cycle until enough radiant energy is released that stable atomic bonds can be sustained.
The Never End
That is how your universe got here and how the other distant universes are forming. And as this universe dissipates from its initial explosion to become extremely thin in mass density, the whole process is already reoccurring elsewhere, fore the attraction effects never really stop - ever. Every new cluster of galaxies forms in its own vast segment of space from its own Big Bang. Infinity is a very, very large place.
It is all an eternal dynamic process that never began and will never end. The larger infinite beginningless and endless universe view is that of clouds forming until rain drops fall upon the surface of an endless ocean that in turn generates more clouds. Each splash is another Big Bang and to us, an entire universe.
Premises;
1) Infinite similarity is impossible (by definition of "infinite").
2) Every point in space affects every other point adjacent to it (by definition of "adjacency").
3) Infinite discontinuity is impossible.
The Unbeginning
Logically these premises mean that at all times what looks like empty space to us is really an ocean of subtle motion. A different state of existence logically cannot ever be and has never been. As it is impossible for existence to be in any other state, there could never have been a beginning to the only state possible.
The Quantum Magi talk about "random" creations, but it is not "random". Nothing is ever actually random. The subtle motion within every seemingly empty area of space is in the form of "affectance" or what we could measure as electromagnetic and/or gravitational waves if they were large enough to detect.
Emergence
Smooth waves, rather than spiking random points, are formed due to the mutual affect of every point on its adjacent points. The waves move due to every point in every wave still affecting every adjacent point as the mutual affecting causes shifting in the wave peaks. The "splashing" around of those affectance waves creates a probability pattern concerning the strength of the waves. That pattern is what we eventually see as the beginning essence of the universe emerging, seemingly from nothingness.
As the strength of some waves increase sufficiently, they combine in collision with other waves to form a small particle wherein the affectance noise is clustered around a single point. That congestion of noise containing maximum rates of change is what causes the particle to have inertia and a field of gravity surrounding it as the congestion spreads. It becomes a "hard" particle due to the amount of congested affectance noise. We then declare it to be "matter".
Eventually, the numerous particles begin clumping as they attract each other through both gravity as well as electric potential differences. Some particles merge in such a way as to form a large single particle as their noise unites into a single spinning cluster. This aggregating forms positive, negative and neutral particles that form atoms and larger mass clusters.
Very slowly, larger masses and objects are formed. Trillions of years latter, those clusters have attracted more such clusters and form larger masses such as gas clouds, and small stones.
Eventually a very large single particle is formed that has a comparatively huge inertia and gravity. That particle begins to suck in everything around it as it forms into what we see as a "black-hole". The average black-hole is estimated to have several hundred million times more energy absorbed into it than the average star/sun and they just keep growing.
Such black-holes form at extreme distances from each other. But having extreme mass attraction and necessarily having a difference in electric potential, they have no reason to stay away from each other forever and slowly begin to converge as they still grow. What do you think happens to all of that energy once one falls into another? Even if there had never been a Big Bang, eventually there would be.
The Bang
Eventually the speeding single particle black-holes collide. When some collide at perhaps not too great a speed, they absorb into each other to become merely a still larger single particle black-hole. But some collisions occur at such extreme speeds that the black hole particles explode. When that happens, they release enormous amounts of energy in the form of huge particle clumps and clusters that take the form of stars and large planets and meteors as well as a tremendous amount of radiant energy and smaller formed particles.
But still later, all of that newly formed exploding mass and energy form their own new particles as mass attraction and electric potential still keep bringing them together and forcing them to ether bond in orbits or unite into single particles. The star clusters are so energetic that the bonding cannot keep up with the releasing collision energy and thus they get into a burning cycle until enough radiant energy is released that stable atomic bonds can be sustained.
The Never End
That is how your universe got here and how the other distant universes are forming. And as this universe dissipates from its initial explosion to become extremely thin in mass density, the whole process is already reoccurring elsewhere, fore the attraction effects never really stop - ever. Every new cluster of galaxies forms in its own vast segment of space from its own Big Bang. Infinity is a very, very large place.
It is all an eternal dynamic process that never began and will never end. The larger infinite beginningless and endless universe view is that of clouds forming until rain drops fall upon the surface of an endless ocean that in turn generates more clouds. Each splash is another Big Bang and to us, an entire universe.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)